“Ode on a Grecian Urn” by John Keats
Introduction: Ode on a Grecian Urn is undoubtedly the most renowned ode in the history of English literature. This is a perfectly written, an irregular ode
so though the rhyme been has used throughout, but not in a strict way as in other is done in other forms of ode. John Keats has tried to praise the features of classical Greek art through his ode. Consequently, there cannot be another poetic form is as appropriate as this ode which is a true illustration of classical Greek art itself.
Summary of Ode on a Grecian Urn
John Keats is one of the greatest poets. His poems are monuments of meticulous craftsmanship and supreme aestheticism. A victim of frustrated love, he is concerned with themes of love in much of his poetry. So he’s known as the love poet. Some of his poems demonstrate his capacity to create an imaginary world out of the common experience. Ode On a Grecian Urn
is a good example of this.
In this Keat’s was influenced by the experience of the Greek sculpture. He was a fantastic Greek art admirer. The poem is a philosophical reflection on the connection between art and life, immortality and human death, and the Platonic concept of Truth and Beauty. To the poet, art is the product of intellect, which is inspired by nature. It produces an ideal world far above than common world of life where people are suffering from illness, sadness, pain, starvation, poverty, and death.
The sight of the sculptured images on the Grecian Urn inspires a sense of wonder in the poet. He calls the Urn as a bride wedded to quietness and remaining a virgin. She is the foster child of Time and Silence. Time, the great destroyer has preserved its beauty. It is a timeless thing. Since it represents life, it is a product of time. At the same time, it is immortal. The Urn is a ‘silver historian’ because it gives us a history of the pastoral life of the ancient world. The beautiful woodland scene engraved on it tells us a story far more sweetly than any poem. The poet wonder if the figures are humans or gods. It could be both. He sees the maidens being pursued by their lovers and musicians playing pipes and timbrels. Their ecstasy becomes his.
The poet is inspired and feels a sense of wonder by the sight of marvelous images sculptured on the Urn. He addresses the Urn as a bride wedded to quietness and remaining a virgin. She’s a foster kid of Time and Silence Time the great destroyer has maintained its beauty. It’s something timeless. It is a product of time because it constitutes life. It’s immortal at the same time. The Urn is a ‘silver historian’ as it provides us a history of the ancient world’s pastoral life. The lovely woodland scene engraved on it informs us a tale much sweeter than any poem. The poet wonders if people or gods are the figures. It might be both. He sees the maidens being pursued by their lovers and musicians playing pipes and timbrels. Their ecstasy becomes his.
Keats takes up the themes engraved on Urn one by ine. Firstly, he sees a musician playing his pipe under a tree. The poet is unable to hear the “unheard melodies.” So he imagines that “unheard melodies” are much sweeter than melodies that have been heard. The musical instruments on the Urn are not playing to the “sensual ear,” but they are playing to the soul in us. The tree is immortal as well. It is never going to shed its leaves. Therefore, nature and human beings in the Urn are glad and happy.
Art is fantastic because it is not affected by the sorrow and wretchedness of the world of reality. Keats demonstrates us in this poem that art can capture and immortalize from real-life one fleeting moment of beauty. Human life and happiness are short, but art enshrines them with a perfect beauty that bestows them eternity Any beauty that is not truthful and any reality that is not lovely is irrelevant to mankind.
Word Meanings
citadel – fortress
dales – vales
timbrels – small hand drums
pious – devout
brede –embroidery
Analysis of Ode On Gracian Urn
Stanza I Analysis
Line 1
Thou still unravish’d bride of quietness,
Like many people nowadays, Keats addresses the urn as if it were a beautiful woman. He refers to her as the “unravish’d bride of quietness,” implying that the urn is married to a man named Quietness. But urns can not marry, thus he is probably implying that a really old pot and peace and quiet go together. Imagine the speaker in a large, empty museum room, and you will understand why the speaker is quiet.
“Still unravish’d” is another option. This is a sensual poem, even if it may not appear such on the surface. The word “ravish” refers to the act of taking or carrying something away by force, as well as having violent, passionate sex with someone. The word “ravish” is adored by authors of titillating romance novels.
This urn, on the other hand, has yet to be ravished. They have not completed their marriage by having intercourse, despite “she” being married to stillness. Even though it is rather old, it appears young and pure.
You are not alone if you do not understand the whole sex-and-marriage metaphor for a pot. However, you must admit that it does sound interesting. If you want to simplify the first phrase, he is arguing that the urn has spent its existence in “quietness,” whether in a museum or buried in Greek ruins, but it is still in good shape and has not been damaged.
Line 2
Thou foster-child of Silence and slow Time,
The urn is said to as Silence’s and Slow Time’s “foster-child.” A “foster-child” is a child who is adopted and nurtured by someone other than his or her biological parents.
The urn has been adopted by “Silence” and “slow Time,” who sound like an even more dull couple than Mrs. Urn and Mr. Quietness.
The argument is that the pot is thousands of years old and has spent the majority of its life buried in rubble or tucked away in a corner of some museum or private collector’s home. However, they were not the “original” circumstances.
The urn’s true “parent” would have been the Greek artist who crafted it. Furthermore, the pot could have served a ceremonial purpose rather than being purely decorative.
However, after the fall of Greek civilization, the pot was left to age in silence, outside of the dynamic society in which he was born.
Lines 3-4
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
So far, the speaker has addressed the urn with a variety of names and titles. “You, John Doe, husband of Jane Doe, son of Susie and Richard Doe, lawyer at the firm of…” This phrase now tells us what the urn’s job or occupation is: “Sylvan historian.”
You have probably never seen that one on a business card, have you? “Sylvan” is just a Latin term that refers to woodlands or forests. As a result, the urn is a forest-dwelling people’s historian. It is a storyteller (the word “history” is derived from a Latin word for “storey” or “tale”), and a very excellent one at that.
The urn, in fact, tells a better story than the poet.
The urn utilises visuals to communicate stories, but the poet employs “rhymes.” The urn’s storey is “flowery” and “sweet,” as if you could bury your nose in it like a bee in a blossom.
This is fitting because this specific urn shows scenes from nature. Furthermore, “flowery” works as a pun. If a storey is “flowery,” it is complicated and has many ins and outs.
The story conveyed on an urn, on the other hand, is “flowery” in a more literal sense: the images on urns were frequently framed by a pattern of leaves or flowers.
Line 5-7
What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape
Of deities or mortals, or of both,
In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
At this point, our speaker leans in for a closer look at the urn. He is attempting to decipher what is going on in the carved pictures that surround it.
In line 4, we got the flowers, and now we get the leaves. The “legend” or storey on the pot is “leaffringed,” which expands on the concept of the “Sylvan” or forest historian.
However, this “legend” sounds suspiciously like a ghost storey: it “haunts.” Another pun, because “haunt” might simply mean to exist in a specific location, yet it has that clear connection to the dead. Indeed, we would anticipate all of the characters in a storey told thousands of years ago to be dead by now.
And who are these people, the speaker wonders? Are they gods (“deities”) or ordinary people (“mortals”)?
Because all of the gods were depicted as appearing like people in Ancient Greece, it was difficult to tell them apart in a photograph. The gods enjoyed socialising with mortals as well.
Needless to say, it is difficult to tell whether these folks are mortals or gods.
The speaker is also curious in the setting of the storey.
He makes a couple of educated assumptions based on his understanding of Ancient Greece: Tempe and “Arcady,” or Arcadia. (A “dale” is nothing more than a valley.)
Line 8-10
What men or gods are these? what maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?
Keats is pulling off a smart ruse here. Keats is informing us about the storey while having the speaker try to figure out what is on the pictures.
The speaker asks the question regarding “deities or mortals” again, but this time in a more casual tone: are they “men or gods”?
It helps to have some background in a fairly popular Ancient Greek theme: a bunch of lustful dudes running around a bunch of attractive girls and attempting to get some activity. Males were frequently half-man, half-goat-like creatures known as “satyrs,” but Keats makes no reference of satyrs, so we can not draw that inference.
If you want to take a more darker approach, picture the women being pursued against their will.
But we will give these couples the benefit of the doubt and assume the women are just having fun.
They are “loth” or “loath” to have sex, which suggests they are hesitant, however this could be a playful reluctance.
The males are chasing the women in “mad pursuit,” while the women “struggle to escape.”
This cat-and-mouse game appears to be a game. It would not make sense to add people playing instruments like “pipes and timbrels” in a serious chase scene (a timbrel is like a tambourine).
Everyone appears to be content. But not just content, as in cheerful.
We are talking about boisterous, chaotic, best-party-of-my-life joy. We are discussing “wild ecstasy.” Everyone is dancing and dashing around.
Stanza II Analysis
Lines 11-12
Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
The speaker appears to have moved on to another of the pictures on the side of the urn in this stanza.
There is music playing, as in the opening scene. The music is performed on “pipes,” which are similar to a rudimentary version of a flute. These pipes, in contrast to the boisterous party music of the previous stanza, are “soft.”
The speaker comes to a completely counter-intuitive conclusion. He claims that the songs he does not hear are “sweeter” than those he does.
This claim appears to be a paradox: it does not appear to make sense. Nobody listens to their music player with the volume turned all the way down so they can “imagine” the music they can not hear.
This is the first instance of a tactic that Keats will employ throughout the poem.
He treats the sceneries on the urn as if they are genuine places and happenings, rather than just a representation of a location. On the urn, real individuals are “living,” but they are stuck in time.
The piper is actually playing a melody, but you can not hear it because urns do not create noise. The speaker is picturing what the song would sound like, and he believes that the tune he is hearing in his head is better than anything he has heard with his senses.
In other words, he prefers the dream world to the physical world.
He tells the “soft pipes” to keep playing, despite the fact that he is the one making the pipes play by picturing them.
It is almost as though he is talking to himself in this way. He is both a musician and a member of the crowd.
Lines 13-14
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear’d, Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:
The speaker continues to issue directives that only he can carry out. He instructs the pipes to play not to his “sensual” or physical ear, but to his “spirit,” or imagination’s, metaphorical ear. This spiritual ear is “more endear’d,” or cherished, than his physical hearing.
As if that were not bizarre enough, he requests that the pipes play “ditties of no tone,” or melodies with no notes or sounds, at least in the real world. Songs from the imagination.
Lines 15-16
Fair youth, beneath the trees, thou canst not leave
Thy song, nor ever can those trees be bare;
The name of our enigmatic musician has been revealed! Colonel Mustard was there with the Lead Pipe in the Conservatory. It was a handsome young man (“fair youth”) sitting among the woods, and his pipe was most likely made of wood.
Here comes Keats’s trick once more. He treats the urn as if it were a real place, and because that place never changes, the guy under the tree will always be playing the same song, in the same stance, forever!
It is similar to Bill Murray’s life in Groundhog Day, but with less diversity.
However, for the speaker, this is a good thing. Because the seasons never change, the temperature is always pleasant, and the trees are never “bare,” that is, without leaves.
Eden is the name. Spring will never end.
Line 17
Bold lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Now he returns to the initial scenario, the males following the women, and begins conversing with one of them.
He refers to him as “bold,” probably because he took the initiative to pursue his girlfriend into the forest. In modern parlance, he is like a guy who is not scared to ask for a girl’s phone number.
“I know you are hoping to make it with that nice girl you are chasing, but I have got bad news for you: It is not going to happen,” the speaker adds. Ever. I am not sure you realise it, but you live on an urn, you are just a picture that can not move or change. But there is one distinct advantage to the situation: you will always feel the same way about her, and she will always be stunning.
This is a ridiculous thing to say, and it reveals more about the speaker than the lover. The speaker wishes to envision a world in which nothing changes and pleasant things never end.
The speaker is not the most diplomatic person in the world, and he uses the word “never” twice as if to hammer home the bad news. He also characterises the chase sequence as if it were an athletic contest in which having sex is a “winner.” It is like the locker-room banter of Romantic poetry.
Stanza III Analysis
Lines 21-22
Ah, happy, happy boughs! that cannot shed
Your leaves, nor ever bid the Spring adieu;
Because the world of the urn never changes, the branches of the trees never lose their leaves.
The urn is to the Ancient Greek world what a Norman Rockwell painting is to 1950s America: it depicts a period in time when everything appears to be healthy and pleasant. In this case, it is always spring, and the trees are constantly green.
After repeating the word “never” twice in line 17, the speaker appears to have decided that repeating words is his new thing, and he does it several times in this stanza. In line 21, he says “happy” twice in a row. He also continues to speak to items that cannot answer to him, such as the “boughs” or branches of the trees pictured on the urn.
Finally, he continues to regard the urn as a genuine place where nothing ever changes.
To bid “adieu” is to say “goodbye” in French, with the assumption that you would not see someone again for a long time. If someone travels down the street to the corner store, you say “au revoir,” but if they move to another state, you say “adieu.”
Fortunately for the tree branches, they never have to say goodbye to Spring, which will never be replaced by summer in this world.
Some readers believed the speaker’s frequent use of the word “happy” smacked of desperation, as if he was trying to convince himself that everlasting springtime would be a wonderful thing, rather than a giant snooze-fest.
After all, how long can you sit around looking at tree leaves?
Lines 23-24
And, happy melodist, unwearied,
For ever piping songs for ever new;
These phrases lead us to believe that the speaker is still discussing the urn’s second scene: the young musician playing the pipes beside a tree.
He now refers to him as a “melodist.” On the pipes, unlike the piano, you cannot play both melody and harmony. You must choose one, and the most obvious option is to perform a melody.
You will not be surprised to hear that the “melodist,” like everyone else in the world, is “happy.” He is also “unwearied,” which indicates he is never exhausted.
You may notice that the word has an accent at the end in your version of the poem, so it reads “un-wear-i-ed.” What is the deal with that? It signifies that Keats prefers the term to be pronounced with four syllables rather than three.
He uses this to maintain a perfect ten-syllable iambic pentameter, which is discussed more in the “Form and Meter” section.
However, you might think of the accent as a notation on a piece of sheet music, which may be significant given that the speaker is talking about music at this time. Is he making a comparison to the “happy melodist”? We believe so.
In line 24, the speaker states that the musician’s songs are always fresh and new. Again, this is due to the fact that the urn’s universe never changes.
As if our world had frozen while you were listening to the radio, whatever was on the Top40 station would always be regarded hip and catchy.
Of course, we all know that most pop songs do not spend more than a few weeks in the Top-40. We get tired of old songs and seek new ones, which is why there will always be a demand for young teen pop singers to replace older teen pop stars from the previous year.
Line 25
More happy love! more happy, happy love!
Many readers believe that this is the point at which the speaker begins to drift off into his own world. Three “happy” words in a row? Our speaker, we suppose, is the type of person who puts 25 packets of sugar in their iced tea. He like sweets, in case you had not noticed. But do these “happy” sentiments hold any weight?
If you wish to be less cynical, you may interpret these sentences as the speaker urging the musician to continue playing by requesting more tunes.
He believes that music and “love” go hand in hand, and that more music equals more love. He is like a concertgoer waving his hands and chanting, “Another! Another!” There are two more songs! “There are ten more songs!”
Line 26-27
For ever warm and still to be enjoy’d,
For ever panting, and for ever young;
When it comes to seex, many individuals believe that the most thrilling aspect comes before the deed. It is the season of seduction and chase.
The “after” period, on the other hand, is when individuals often question what they were so worked up over. The same may be said for love affairs over a longer period of time. They are frequently the most thrilling at first, before things settle into a routine.
The speaker appears to have returned to the original image on the urn, of “men or gods” chasing a group of ladies, and he imagines that everyone in the scene is at their most sensual.
The males are on the verge of catching the women, but they have not yet, so they are continually anticipating the big moment.
Women’s bodies are “warm and still to be enjoyed,” according to line 26. Both men and women are “panting” from their pursuit in line 27.
The speaker continues to use the phrase “forever” in his repetition pattern to emphasise that the people on the urn are trapped in time. Art is a realm that never ends.
We will now make the case for a different interpretation. The throbbing beat of his speech and the repetition of his phrases (being sexually thrilled is not the most creative human state) are clear signs of sexual excitation in our speaker. He may require a chilly shower.
Lines 28-30
All breathing human passion far above,
That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy’d,
A burning forehead and a parching tongue.
The grammar in line 28 is a little strange. Generations of readers have been perplexed by these lines. Line 27 mentioned the couples’ “panting,” but these lines now seem to imply that the lovers are “far above” or “better than” the “breathing human passion” of the normal world. That is one way of looking at it. But here’s one that is a little different.
“Far above” in this second reading refers to the speaker’s perspective, our ecstatic guy who is “breathing” on the museum display case as he salivates over the urn.
The phrase “all” implies that the speaker is aware that he is a part of a far larger and more numerous world than the urn’s inhabitants. In other words, the urn resembles a miniature globe that has been frozen in time as people move, breathe, and go about their daily lives all around it.
So, if the speaker is the “human passion” that looks down from “far above” on this small planet, line 29 must relate to his “heart,” not just any old heart.
The speaker’s heart becomes “high-sorrowful and cloy’d” when he sees the happy lovers. In other words, he is filled with a theatrical, woe-is-me sorrow.
Having too much of a good thing is referred to as “cloy’d.” Instead of a warm and pleasant “panting,” the speaker feels overheated, with a “burning forehead,” and extremely thirsty, with “a parching of tongue.”
He reminds me of a man stranded in the desert. Instead of water, he yearns for love.
Stanza IV Analysis
Line 31
Who are these coming to the sacrifice?
Just as we thought the speaker would pass out from the lovers’ steamy, sticky atmosphere, he manages to divert his focus to something else.
The speaker is now staring at the urn’s third scene, which depicts an animal sacrifice.
The speaking is leaning in and attempting to understand out what is going on in the situation, much like in stanza I. He questioned “What?” in the first stanza, and now he asks, “Who?” There appear to be a large number of individuals who have come to witness the sacrifice.
Line 32-34
To what green altar, O mysterious priest, Lead’st thou that heifer lowing at the skies,
And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?
Now our speaker addresses the priest on the urn, asking, “Hey, where are you going?” He is curious as to “what green altar” he is taking a cow (“heifer”).
An altar was a place where sacrifices were made in classical times, and this one is covered with leaves and greenery, making it green. The sad cow must be aware of what is about to happen since it sighs or “lows” at the sky.
Its sides (“flanks”) are adorned with a flower string or “garland.” This cow is a holy artefact meant for the Gods.
Lines 35-37
What little town by river or sea shore,
Or mountain-built with peaceful citadel, Is emptied of this folk, this pious morn?
We can now piece together the entirety of the third scene. There is a priest, a cow, a green altar, and a multitude of people waiting for the sacrifice to begin.
The speaker infers that this gathering must have come from somewhere, from some “little town,” but the location is not shown, so he has to guess what it must have been like.
He imagines things in the world of the urn in the same way that we, the readers, imagine what is happening in the poem. I am intrigued.
This scenario contains only people and cows, but he makes some educated judgments about what the town looks like. It is either a.) by a river, b.) near the sea, or c.) on a mountain.
If it is on a mountain, he imagines a little fortification known as a “citadel” guarding it. However, there is no pressing need to defend the fortress, therefore it is “peaceful.”
This is, without a doubt, a perfect planet. Everyone is outside, enjoying the weather and anticipating the rite. Because it is a “pious” or holy morning, the town has been “emptied.”
Lines 38-40
And, little town, thy streets for evermore
Will silent be; and not a soul to tell
Why thou art desolate, can e’er return.
The speaker addresses the town, informing it that its streets will always be “silent” and “desolate” of inhabitants.
Although the speaker is aware that everyone is on their way to a sacrifice, he has no idea what the sacrifice is for, and he will never find out because there is “not a soul, to tell” the reason for the holy day.
Stanza V Analysis
Lines 41-43
O Attic shape! Fair attitude! with brede
Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With forest branches and the trodden weed;
In comparison to the sweltering stanza III, stanza IV was a peaceful, low-key affair. But in the final stanza, the speaker becomes enthralled once more.
It is like if someone injected adrenaline into his arm. He begins exclaiming at the urn’s exquisite beauty, as though noticing it for the first time.
He is in awe of its “Attic shape,” which simply means it has a particularly Greek aspect, and its “fair attitude,” which refers to a graceful posture. (A “brede” is a braid, like a hair braid.)
The lovers are “braided” together in the chiselled marble, creating a chaotic vision. It makes the carving appear elaborate and ornate.
Indeed, the speaker describes the image as “overwrought,” or overly intricate.
There is simply too much detail and craftsmanship. This may remind us of the usage of the term “cloy’d” in stanza III, another instance where the speaker thought the urn’s artistry was simply too rich.
We already noted that the urn has decorative representations of plants all over it, and now the speaker is disturbed by the “forest branches” and “trodden weed” that appear to be suffocating the poem with flora. They get in the way and make the urn appear cluttered.
He is starting to feel conflicted about this urn. Within two lines, he praises it and dismisses it. He is basically saying, “You have a nice body, but you are trying way too hard to look fancy.”
Lines 44-45
Thou, silent form, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold pastoral!
If you thought his sentiments were jumbled before, these phrases will knock you for a loop.
He begins by pointing to the urn and saying, “You! That is correct. “You, the hushed one.” So far, it is been a very one-sided dialogue (as is common with inanimate items), and now he is attempting to elicit more participation from the urn.
He claims that the urn is so mysterious and perplexing that it is impossible to contemplate.
Our speaker employs the term “tease,” which has at least two connotations. The first is one we are all too familiar with: mocking. The second method is to separate or untangle, as if you were “teasing” apart the nest of cables behind your computer.
We believe that the second meaning is the most important here. The poet compares the feeling of looking at the urn to contemplating eternity, a thought so lofty and difficult to grasp that contemplating it is like not thinking at all.
For the entire poem, the speaker has been building up to this comparison between the world of the urn and eternity. He sees the urn as a world in which nothing changes and nothing can be destroyed, which is pretty much the definition of eternity. Unless, of course, the urn breaks.
Finally, he refers to the scenes on the urn as “Cold Pastoral.” Pastoral imagery is concerned with nature and uncomplicated rural life, therefore it fits perfectly with pictures of quiet towns, youthful lovers, and brilliant, green trees.
But what about “cold”? Are these lines meant to be sarcastic, or are they meant to be flattering? They sound more like a slap in the face, as if the speaker changed his mind after all his discourse about happiness and warm bodies. He could be blaming the urn of being cold and indifferent.
But perhaps he enjoys how the world of the urn is so alien to human life that it is difficult to contemplate.
You may relate it to gazing at distant stars and planets, which appear cold and disinterested yet also convey a sense of beauty and comfort.
Overall, it appears that he understands the urn even less by the end of the poem than he did at the start.
Lines 46-48
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say’st,
“Old age” like the villain in an action movie with a flamethrower to “waste” an entire generation of people — the speaker’s generation.
The speaker imagines that the urn will still be there after everyone in his generation has died.
The current generation’s troubles or “woe” will have been supplanted by fresh problems. But, like a good therapist and a “friend of man,” the urn will be full of advise for future generations. In fact, throughout history, it has always delivered the same advise to everyone, which is.
Lines 49-50
‘Beauty is truth, truth beauty’—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.
Beauty and truth are the same thing. That makes no sense. If beauty and truth are the same thing, why do we have two separate labels for them?
One of the most deceptive aspects of these sentences is how sure they sound, as if “Beauty is truth, truth beauty” is on par with “Gravity causes things to fall down.”
“First and foremost, we did not know that beauty and truth were the same thing.” Second, if you think we already knew that, why are you telling us? Third, why do you believe this is all we ‘need to know?’ “How does this information help us at all?”
To the best of our knowledge, the urn has yet to react to our inquiry. But we can speculate on what these lines could represent.
When it is said that beauty and truth are the same thing, it is commonly assumed to suggest that there is no truth outside of art. We are talking about enormous truths, like life-changing ones.
We believe he is referring to more than simply attractive sights and writings when he says “beauty.” He is referring to anything that offers us a sense of grandeur and a purpose broader than ourselves, including nature’s art.
Truth cannot be “thought.” It is too far and intricate, like the concept of eternity. It can only be felt.
The speaker believes that we do not need truths that can be conveyed in words. The experience of beauty suffices. Enough for what? Well, possibly to live a nice, fulfilling, and meaningful life. There are many things we would like to know about the world, such as why suffering exists. But we do not need to know such things. Beauty is the only absolutely necessary concept.
This last argument is truly quite radical, and it is what distinguishes Keats as one of the most Romantic of the Romantics. If you carry it to its logical conclusion, you do not need any of the truths found in religious or philosophical literature, history books, celebrity magazines, or anywhere else individuals receive their ideas. Tradition-based truths are unnecessary.
Needless to say, British conservatives despised Keats, whom they regarded as a wild-eyed liberal, which he was.
You might just want to throw up your hands and declare that these lines are crazy. You would be in good company. T.S. Eliot, a poet, was never afraid to express himself.
However, for many people, they express truth in just the way they suggest: not via any type of academic argument, but through their rhythm and melody — their beauty.
Questions and Answers
1. The poem opens with a series of comparisons between the urn and random types of people. The comparison between the non-living urn and the very much alive people is known as what?
Ans. The comparisons come in the form of metaphors, but the attribution of living qualities to the urn is known as personification.
2. What is the first picture that the speaker sees on the urn?
Ans. The speaker sees a picture of men chasing women and asks what the reason could be.
3. Why are the melodies played by the piper in the urn’s second picture superior to those played by actual, living pipers?
Ans. The melodies played in the picture, though silent, are unaffected by time and are unconstrained in meaning.
4. Why, according to the speaker, will the town of the fourth stanza be silent “evermore”?
Ans. The town will be silent because its citizens, as depicted in the picture on the urn, have fled it and are frozen in time in the picture.
5. How does the speaker engage, interact, or react to each picture on the urn? Do his responses change? Why?
Ans. The speaker tries to ask questions of the urn with the first picture, but seeing how the urn cannot answer him, he abandons the line of questioning. With the second picture, the speaker tries to imagine what the experience of the characters on the urn must be like, trying hard to identify with them. His attempts, though, remind him of his own life and how he is tied to his experiences, so he abandons this line of interaction. Finally, with the third picture, the speaker tries to think about the characters as though they are experiencing time. His theory gives the picture an origin and destination; but then, unable to know if the journey is completed, he becomes captivated by the static nature of the urn. His responses show a progression in his identification with art.
6. Who speaks the poem’s final line, “that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know”?
Answers may vary. This question has been debated by critics since the poem’s first publication. If the speaker is the speaker of the poem, the line signifies that he understands the limits of art. If the speaker is the urn, then perhaps art shows that there is no limitation to life. The speaker may also be directly addressing the urn itself or the reader.
7. What is the meaning of “unravished bride”?
Ans. “Unravished bride” implies a bride not spoiled by man’s hand. Her chastity is still maintained. The sentence not only stresses the untouched beauty of the urn but also takes us to the point that the urn is spiritually lovely. No one can comprehend the secret of its marvelous beauty.
